Analyze the following argument by paraphrasing the propositions to reveal the premisses and conclusion.

 

We should prosecute people who steal copyrighted material. Taking someone’s artistic creation without paying for it deprives the artist of a deserved royalty. Lacking a reasonable royalty the artist cannot survive. Artistic creations are precious commodities deserving of support. We support artists by purchasing their creations.

 

Answer

Premisses

1. Artistic creations are precious commodities.

2. We support artists by purchasing their creations.

3. Taking someone’s artistic creation without paying for it deprives the artist of a deserved royalty.

4. Lacking a reasonable royalty the artist cannot survive.

 

Conclusion

Therefore, we should prosecute people who steal copyrighted material.

 

 


2.

Analyze the following argument by numbering the propositions and diagramming its structure to reveal the relationship between the premisses and conclusion.

 

Professional athletes are paid way too much money. A family with an average income cannot afford to go to most sporting events. In addition, many professional athletes are criminals and do not deserve our adulation. This is why we should boycott professional sports.

 

 

Answer

[1] Professional athletes are paid way too much money. [2] A family with an average income cannot afford to go to most sporting events. In addition, [3] many professional athletes are criminals and do not deserve our adulation. This is why [4] we should boycott professional sports.

 

The first three propositions are premises.  Each of which independently supports the conclusion that we should boycott professional sports. A diagram would look like this:

 


                               1            2             3

 

 

 

 


                                               4

 

 


In each of the following passages, identify and number all propositions, paraphrasing as needed to fill in unstated propositions and to reformulate rhetorical questions and imperatives. Identify the premisses and conclusions and diagram the structure of the argument.

 

 

1.

Gasoline prices will not go down. Under the new administration we will get additional oil from once protected parts of Alaska, but the amount will be too small to have any affect on the overall supply. Coal production is going to be raised, but it will not offset the ever-increasing amount of gasoline that is consumed by cars, trucks, and airplanes. In addition, the new administration will more than likely reduce the pressure on the automobile makers to increase gas mileage in new cars.

 

Hint: Look for the conclusion first. Determine whether the premisses work independently or dependently. Look for interwoven arguments. Look for rhetorical questions and unstated propositions.

 

Answer

[1] Gasoline prices will not go down. [2] Under the new administration we will get additional oil from once protected parts of Alaska, but the amount will be too small to have any affect on the overall supply. [3] Coal production is going to be raised, but it will not offset the ever-increasing amount of gasoline that is consumed by cars, trucks, and airplanes. In addition, [4] the new administration will more than likely reduce the pressure on the automobile makers to increase gas mileage in new cars.

 

 

Diagram:

 


                                2               3             4

 

 

 

 


                                                 1

 

 

 

 


2.

 Don’t you know that driving without a seat-belt is dangerous? Statistics show that you are 10 times more likely to be injured in an accident if you are not wearing one. Besides, in our state you can get fined $100, if you are caught not wearing one. You ought to wear one even if you are driving a short distance.

 

Hint: Look for the conclusion first. Determine whether the premisses work independently or dependently. Look for interwoven arguments. Look for rhetorical questions and unstated propositions.

 

Answer

[1] Driving without a seat-belt is dangerous [rephrased rhetorical question]. [2] Statistics show that you are 10 times more likely to be injured in an accident, if you are not wearing one. [3] Besides, in our state you can get fined $100 if you are caught not wearing one. [4]You ought to wear one even if you are driving a short distance.

 

 

Diagram:

 

                                                                                               

                                              2

 

 


                                             1              3

 

 

 


                                                       4


3.

Jean studied at least 10 hours for the exam and she got an ‘A’. Bill studied at least 10 hours for the exam and he got an ‘A’. Sue studied at least 10 hours for the exam and she got an ‘A’. Jim probably got an ‘A’ on the exam.

 

Hint: Look for the conclusion first. Determine whether the premisses work independently or dependently. Look for interwoven arguments. Look for rhetorical questions and unstated propositions.

 

Answer

[1] Jean studied at least 10 hours for the exam and she got an ‘A’. [2] Bill studied at least 10 hours for the exam and he got an ‘A’. [3] Sue studied at least 10 hours for the exam and she got an ‘A’. [4] Jim studied at least 10 hours for the exam. [unstated premiss]. [5] Jim probably got an ‘A’ on the exam.

 

 

 

Diagram:

 


                  1           2           3              4

 

 

 

 


                                     5

 

 

[[ “1,” “2,” and “3” work together to support “5”—“Jim probably got an ‘A’ on the exam.” “4” support “5” independently. If the conclusion is “As long as one studied at least 10 hours for the exam and one got an ‘A’.” then “1,” “2,” “3, and “4” work together to support the conclusion. And “4” would be “Jim studied at least 10 hours for the exam and he got an ‘A’ on the exam.”]]  

 

 

 

 

Try It! 1.6

[[Requires word processing tool]]

For each of the following passages, decide which is an argument and which an explanation. decide whether an argument or an explanation is being given.

 

1.

He did not come to class today. It must be because he is ill.

 

Hint: An argument attempts to establish the truth of some proposition by offering evidence in support of it. An explanation attempts to account for a fact already known to be true.

 

Answer

It is a fact that he did not come to class. His being ill is offered as a possible explanation for the fact.

 

2.

The last time Clint Eastwood won an Oscar was for a western he directed. He will probably direct another western soon, so he has a chance to get another Oscar.

 

Hint: An argument attempts to establish the truth of some proposition by offering evidence in support of it. An explanation attempts to account for a fact already known to be true.

 

Answer

The first proposition states a fact, but the second one does not try to explain that fact. Rather, the first proposition is being used as a premiss, to support a prediction (the conclusion) about what Clint Eastwood will do.

 

3.

There are a lot of people getting into weird mystical cults lately. It must be because they are disappointed with traditional religions.

 

Hint: An argument attempts to establish the truth of some proposition by offering evidence in support of it. An explanation attempts to account for a fact already known to be true.

 

Answer

The first proposition states what is believed to be a fact, and the second proposition tries to provide an explanation for that fact.

 

4.

The cost of computers has dropped incredibly in the last few years. It will probably keep going down in the near future as well.

 

Hint: An argument attempts to establish the truth of some proposition by offering evidence in support of it. An explanation attempts to account for a fact already known to be true.

 

Answer

The first proposition states a fact, and based on that fact, a prediction is being made. The first proposition is therefore being used as a premiss to support the conclusion (the prediction).

 

5.

The cost of home computers has dropped incredibly in the last few years. I’m sure it’s because the cost of producing microchips has plummeted.

 

Hint: An argument attempts to establish the truth of some proposition by offering evidence in support of it. An explanation attempts to account for a fact already known to be true.

 

Answer

The first proposition states a fact, but in this case it does not support the second proposition. Rather, the second proposition is used to offer an explanation of the fact stated in the first proposition.

 

 

 

 


Diagram the structure of the following complex argumentative passage.

 

Since you are going to have to work for a living for most of your life, you should get into an occupation that you enjoy.  Of course, it is not always possible to correctly predict how you will like a certain occupation.  Sometimes a career looks good from the outside, but when you actually do it for a while it loses its appeal. Getting a broad education allows you to gain general skills applicable to many careers. Sometimes specializing too early locks you into a field that you may not like later on in life. These are some of the reasons why getting a liberal arts education can be a good decision.

 

 

Answer

[1] Since you are going to have to work for a living for most of your life, [2] you should get into an occupation that you enjoy. [3] Of course, it is not always possible to correctly predict how you will like a certain occupation. [4] Sometimes a career looks good from the outside, but when you actually do it for a while it loses its appeal. [5] Getting a broad education allows you to gain general skills applicable to many careers. [6] Sometimes specializing too early locks you into a field that you may not like later on in life. [7] These are some of the reasons why getting a liberal arts education can be a good decision.

 


                           1             3       4      5    +   6

 

 

 


                           2 

 

 

                                                        7

 

 

[[No need “+”]]