PHL/CNE 370: History of Classical Greek Philosophy

Summer 2012        M T W R F 1:00–4:00 pm       Prof. Stephens       Dowling Hall Humanities Center (DHHC) 1

office hours: Mon. thru Fri. 4:05 - 4:30 pm and by appointment

office: DHHC 209       phone (with voicemail): 280-2632       stphns AT creighton DOT edu


The Death of Socrates by Jacques Louis David

The Death of Socrates by Jean-François-Pierre Peyron


Description

Through the close and careful examination of the original texts we will study the richness and complexities of ancient Greek philosophy during the “Classical” period (7th to 4th century BCE).  Beginning with the Presocratics, whose extant texts are sadly fragmentary, we will trace the development of recognizably philosophical, that is, rational, non-superstitious, scientific thinking about the world-order (kosmos), nature (physis), soul (psychē), and reason (logos) through the Sophists of the Greek Enlightenment period and Socrates, as he is portrayed in Platos dialogues.  The central figures of the course will be Plato and Aristotle.  We will read three of the earlier Platonic dialogues, students will elect one additional dialogue for us to study, and we will study all of the Republic, which is arguably the greatest, most influential philosophical masterpiece of Western civilization.  We will then investigate Aristotles ingenious and extensive system of thought.  Aristotelian ideas profoundly shaped Medieval philosophy, theology, logic, and the natural sciences for centuries.  Consequently, any decent understanding of our cultural heritage, the history of ideas, of science, of religion, and, of course, the history of Western philosophy, must necessarily begin with a study of the history of Classical Greek philosophy.  It is wise for philosophy majors to take this course before they attempt any serious study of philosophers who were born after Aristotle (e.g. Epicurus, the Stoics, Plotinus, Augustine, Anselm, Abelard, Aquinas, Ockham, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, J. S. Mill, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Sartre, Foucault, Derrida, any other French or German philosopher, any other British philosopher, any American philosopher—you get the idea).

Required Texts

Recommended Texts

Course Requirements and Percentage of Final Grade

  Presocratics Exam (historically this has been the toughest exam)  10%
  Plato Exam #1  15%
  Plato Paper on Apology & Crito (1700 to @2000 words)  18%
  Plato Exam #2  15%
  Final Exam on Aristotle  30%
  Participation  12%

Standards of Evaluation for Letter Grades

AF   F due to excessive (3 or more) absences (2 tardies = 1 absence)

F    “Failure – no credit” (<60% average)

D    “Work of inferior quality, but passing” (60 to <68% average)

C    “Satisfactory work”

B    “Noteworthy level of performance”    Demonstrates all of the qualities of satisfactory work plus:

A    “Outstanding achievement and an unusual degree of intellectual initiative”  Demonstrates all of the qualities of noteworthy performance plus:

Participation and Attendance

Daily, punctual attendance is vital for this kind of intensive summer course.  Two (2) tardies count as one (1) absence.  Even one absence is a very bad idea.  Three (3) absences earn an AF for the course.  Two kinds of activities count as “participation.”  One happens inside of class.  The other occurs outside of class.  Participation inside of class is raising your hand to be called on and making comments about the reading or the discussion, or asking questions about the reading or my lecture, or responding to questions I raise or comments made by other students.  Participation outside of class participation includes (a) substantive posts on the BlueLine Discussion Forum for the course or (b) philosophical conversations with Prof. Stephens outside of the classroom.  A post is “substantive” if and only if it addresses, and seeks to understand better, an idea, theory, or argument in the course.  For example, asking a thoughtful, specific, and philosophically interesting question certainly counts as a substantive post.  A post is not “substantive” if it merely repeats what someone else has written, quotes a text without analyzing or evaluating it, or expresses confusion without striving to understand an idea, theory, or argument in the course.  Both quality and quantity of participation remarks are recorded.  Since we will be closely attending to the readings in our class discussions, it is important that everyday you bring to class your book.  All students are expected to model academic honesty and integrity in all their work for this course.

Ordinarily, a necessary condition for a tardy or absence being counted as excused due to illness or emergency is email or telephone notification to Prof. Stephens BEFORE class begins on the day in question.  Notifying Prof. Stephens by email or telephone prior to class that illness or emergency will prevent a student from punctual class attendance is ordinarily sufficient for that tardy or absence to count as excused, but this is ultimately up to Prof. Stephens.

Thesis Defense Paper Specifications

Students should read and closely follow the specifications in How to Write Philosophy Papers in writing their papers.  The finished, polished, carefully edited, and meticulously proofread paper should be 1700 to approximately 2000 words in length.  (You are permitted to exceed 2000 words within reason, but please don’t abuse this latitude.)  Papers of fewer than 1700 words are unacceptable.

In the introductory paragraph YOU MUST STATE YOUR THESIS with a sentence that begins either “My thesis is that...” or “In this paper I will argue that...” followed by your thesis statement.  See How to Write Philosophy Papers.

This T. D. paper should have... (a) a cover page Include your NAME, the COURSE number and name, the correctly spelled name of your PROFESSOR, a clever and apt TITLE, the WORD COUNT of the body, and the DATE submitted.  (Note: This is NOT the date you began writing the paper or the date the paper was due.  It is the date you put the paper into your professors hands.)  Do not print a page number on the cover page.
  (b) a body Number these pages 1, 2, 3, and so on.  Only the words in the body count toward the papers word count printed on the cover page.  Use Arabic numerals.
  (c) an Endnotes page In both the body of the paper and on the Notes page, number citations strictly sequentially: 1, 2, 3, and so on.  Use Arabic numerals.  NEVER use Roman numerals!
Staple pages together in upper lefthand  corner. (d) a Works Cited page This is the last page.

Do NOT underline anything anywhere in the paper.  Italicize the titles of all books, periodicals, and transliterated Greek words.  Titles of articles and news stories should be set between double quotation marks (e.g. “Title of Article”).

Grading Criteria for the Thesis Defense Paper

Your paper will be a thesis defense paper.  In a thesis defense paper the student takes a stand on a philosophical issue relevant to the course and pertinent to the assigned TOPIC for that paper.  The student must clearly explain what her position is after explicitly stating it in the introductory paragraph.  Then, in the body of the paper, the student must justify her thesis by presenting page after page of arguments to support it.  Then the student must discuss the most intelligent objections to and counterarguments against her position that she can think of.  Finally she must reply to these intelligent objections and defend her thesis (which may require modifying it) in response to the counterarguments.

Papers will be graded on the following criteria:

For greater detail, see “How Prof. Stephens grades a thesis defense paper.”
For a sample paper in the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) format, see http://dianahacker.com/pdfs/hacker-bish-cms.pdf.

Paper Submission Policy

Papers should be submitted on time Since this is an intensive course, extensions are unlikely to be granted, but requests for extensions must be made at least two (2) class days  (i.e. weekdays) prior to the due date Papers submitted after the due date (or granted extension date) will be penalized  8 points per weekday late.

Academic Honesty Statement

Students are strongly encouraged to discuss ideas with each other outside of class.  But students are required to produce their own original work, ideas, arguments, and sentences in their papers and in their exam essays.  Students may NOT work with others, and may NOT borrow from others, in writing their papers or essays.  Citations on papers should follow the guidelines in How to Write Philosophy Papers.  If you cheat on an exam, then you will receive at minimum a zero on that exam.  If you plagiarize any part of a paper, then you will receive a zero on that paper. If the instructor judges a case of cheating or plagiarism to be flagrant, the student will get an F for the course.  See the Creighton College of Arts & Sciences Academic Honesty Procedures.

Keep in Contact with the Professor throughout the Course

If you have any problem that hinders you from attending class, doing the assigned reading, studying for the exams, or writing your papers, please come see me or call me or send me e-mail or leave me a note in my mailbox or under my office door.  Whatever happens, it is your responsibility to keep in contact with Prof. Stephens.  Failure to do so usually has unhappy consequences.

Selected Websites


Schedule of Assignments


Thales

Pythagoras

Heraclitus

Parmenides

Protagoras

The Presocratics and the Sophists


M May 14 The Presocratics and the Sophists: 1. Introduction (1–10), 2. The Milesians: Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes (10–17),
  3. Pythagoras and Early Pythagoreanism (18–23), 4. Xenophanes (23–29), and the Greek alphabet (on BlueLine under “Lessons”)
  Review Vaughn, “How to Read Philosophy” and “How to Read an Argument”
   
T May 15 5. Heraclitus (29–40), 6. Parmenides of Elea (40–47), and 7. Zeno of Elea (47–51)
   
W May 16 8. Empedocles of Acragas (52–74), 9. Anaxagoras of Clazomenae (75–80), 10. Leucippus and Democritus (80–93),
  14. The Sophists: Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias, Antiphon (104–118)       Review Guide for Presocratics Exam
                                                                   
R May 17 Presocratics Exam and...

Socrates and Plato

Socrates

Plato

 

R May 17 (contd) Introduction (127–134), Apology (153–178), and the oracle of Delphi story in Nature 17 July 2001
   
F May 18 Crito (179–191) and Meno (241–266)                  Review Guide for Plato Exam #1
   
M May 21 Paper on Apology & Crito DUE at the beginning of class; Plato Exam #1 and...  Republic I and II (369–423) and
Alexander Nehamas, Plato's Pop Culture Problem and Ours, The New York Times, Aug. 29, 2010
T May 22 Republic III, IV, and V (424–514)  
   
W May 23 Republic VI, VII, and VIII (515–593)         A YouTube video of an adaptation of Plato's Allegory of the Cave
                        First picture of Plato’s Cave       Second picture of Plato’s Cave       Third picture of Plato’s Cave
   
R May 24  Republic IX and X (594–641)                   Review Guide for Plato Exam #2
   
F May 25 Plato Exam #2 and... 

Aristotle


Plato and Aristotle by Raphael

Aristotle


 F May 25 (contd) Introduction (683–693), Categories 1–5 (694–700), De Interpretatione 1–4, 7, 9 (701–708), and Topics I.1–2, 5 (709–713)
   
 Memorial Day Monday NO CLASS
   
 T May 29 Physics II (740–757), De Anima I.1, II.1–6, III.3-5 (847–867), Posterior Analytics II.19 (728–731), Metaphysics I.1–3 (796–803)
   
 W May 30 Metaphysics XII.6–9 (838–846), Nicomachean Ethics I.1–5, 7-9, 13, and II.1-6 (870–890)
   
 R May 31 Nicomachean Ethics VI.1-2, 5, 7, 12–13, VII.1–3, and X.6–9 (905–929), and Politics I.1–2 (930–933)        Review Guide for Aristotle Exam
   
 F June 1 Aristotle Exam

* The instructor reserves the right, at his discretion and as needed, to change anything in this syllabus during this course.

last updated 16 April 2013
Copyright © 2013 William O. Stephens